In the aftermath of the October 7th attack by Hamas, a disturbing trend of Antisemitism has emerged in Western media and academic circles. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) highlighted instances of denialism, where the severity of the Hamas attacks was downplayed, and false narratives were promoted, portraying Hamas as benevolent and Israel as the aggressor. This included claims by the US-based Mint Press News falsely alleging that the majority of those killed were soldiers, despite them being civilians, and the Palestinian Foreign Ministry suggesting that the Israeli army was responsible for the attacks.
​
The Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) analyzed YouTube comments, revealing a significant presence of Antisemitic narratives, including classical Antisemitism and calls for extremist violence against Jews. These comments often contained conspiracy theories and comparisons of Jews or Israel to Nazis, reflecting a deeply rooted bias and misinformation.
​
ABC7 Chicago reported on the CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad's comments on the attack, which were criticized by Jewish advocacy groups and the White House. Despite this, Awad pushed back against the criticism, highlighting the complexities in addressing Antisemitism in public discourse.
The ADL also noted that some U.S. professors praised the Hamas terror attacks, expressing inflammatory views and celebrating Hamas’s actions, further fueling Antisemitic sentiments. This academic endorsement of violence against Israel and Jews is particularly concerning, as it legitimizes Antisemitism under the guise of political commentary.
​
The American Jewish Committee (AJC) discussed media bias in the coverage of the Hamas attack on Israel. They pointed out the reluctance of Western media outlets to label Hamas as a terrorist group, often using euphemisms like “militants” instead. This bias in media reporting contributes to a skewed perception of the conflict, often omitting the terrorist nature of Hamas and its attacks on Israeli civilians.
​
The BBC has faced significant criticism for its handling of Antisemitic incidents, particularly in its coverage of events related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The Telegraph accuses the BBC of deep-rooted prejudice, contributing to the spread of Antisemitism, especially following the Al-Alhi hospital explosion in Gaza, where the BBC prematurely blamed Israel. This rush to judgment, according to The Telegraph, has exacerbated global Antisemitic sentiment and violence. Reinforcing these concerns, Reuters reported that the British media regulator Ofcom criticized the BBC for a "serious editorial misjudgement" in its coverage of an Antisemitic incident in London. The BBC failed to promptly report evidence that disputed its initial interpretation of an audio recording, violating guidelines on impartiality and accuracy. These incidents highlight a pattern of bias in the BBC's reporting, raising questions about its journalistic standards and the portrayal of Jewish people and Israel in the media.
​
These instances collectively paint a worrying picture of Antisemitism and media bias in the West, where the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are often oversimplified or misrepresented, leading to a distorted and prejudiced view of the events and contributing to the spread of Antisemitic rhetoric.